THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROSHI HOSOMIZU, TSUTOMU ICHIKAWA,
MAKOTO KAMIYA, MASATOSHI YONEYAMA, and KENZI TUZI
____________
Appeal No. 95-3876
Application 08/222,0091
____________
HEARD: November 6, 1998
____________
Before MARTIN, BARRETT, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Application for patent filed April 4, 1994. This1
application is described by appellants as a continuation of
Application Serial No. 07/881,494, filed May 11, 1992, which
is a divisional of Application Serial No. 07/554,423, filed
July 19, 1990, which is a divisional of Application Serial No.
07/216,381, filed July 8, 1988 (now Patent No. 4,951,081).
Appellants claim the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Japanese
Application No. 173466/1987, filed July 10, 1987.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007