Appeal No. 96-0908 Application 08/160,118 pixels in register 52 and currently stored pixels in register 54 produces one bit in the result (mask) register 56 (which can also be called a status register or flag register). Figure 4 shows a 32-bit field size which produces the two leftmost result bits in register 56 which are used in the merge operation in figure 5. Figure 6 shows an 8-bit field size which produces eight result bits. One of ordinary skill would have appreciated from these two examples that the field size can be the width of the whole register where the comparison produces one status bit. Moreover, the claim language, as broadly interpreted, does not distinguish over Diefendorff. Claim 1 recites "data registers, each storing a predetermined number of data bits." The "predetermined number of data bits" does not have to be the total number of bits in the register, but could be, for example, the 32-bit field in figure 3. Thus, this argument of appellants is not persuasive. Appellants argue in the Auslander rejection (Br5): "Second, Diefendorff et al teaches storing the resultant of his pixel merge instruction in a register in general register file 34 and not at an addressed location within memory as - 11 -Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007