Appeal No. 96-1848
Application 08/161,604
(filed March 6,
1989)
S.M. Sze, Semiconductor Devices--Physics and Technology
(John Wiley & Sons 1985), pages 360-61.
The examiner cites the following patents in rebuttal to
arguments in appellants' brief:
Huttemann et al. (Huttemann) 4,981,550 January
1, 1991
Lee et al. (Lee) 4,990,467 February 5,
1991
Claims 31, 32, 35, and 36 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Turner or,
alternatively, over Haskell and Deleonibus.
Claims 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 25-28, and 30 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Haskell and
Deleonibus.
Claims 29 and 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Haskell and Deleonibus, further
in view of Shirai.
Claims 15 and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Haskell, Deleonibus, and Shirai,
further in view of Sze.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007