Ex parte SASAKI et al. - Page 19




          Appeal No. 96-3392                                                          
          Application 08/121,512                                                      

          subject matter.  Appellants probably mean to refer to claims                
          8, 14, and 19.  However, since no argument was provided with                
          respect to the rejection of claims 6, 12, and 17 or claims 8,               
          14, and 19, appellants nowhere address the merits of the                    
          examiner's rejection.  Because appellants have not argued any               
          error in the examiner's findings of fact or conclusions of                  
          law, the rejection of claims 28, 35, and 41 is sustained.                   

























                                       - 19 -                                         





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007