THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD L. SITES
and RICHARD T. WITEK
____________
Appeal No. 96-4033
Application No. 08/086,3541
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 11 and
13-21. Claims 1 and 3-10 are allowed by the examiner in view of
1Application for patent filed July 1, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/547,589 filed June 29, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007