Ex parte FOGAL - Page 10




            Appeal No. 2000-0949                                                                              
            Application No. 08/721,505                                                                        


            which is variable and not the same as the predetermined or set value.  Holdgrafer clearly         
            teaches the use of a set predetermined value which is not based upon a measured value.            
                   This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR                        
            §  1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131,           
            53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).          
            37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that "[a] new ground of rejection shall not be considered final        
            for purposes of judicial review."                                                                 
                   37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM                 
            THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with                     
            respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR §              
            1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                                              
                                      (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of                                  
                                the claims so rejected or a showing of facts                                  
                                relating to the claims so rejected, or both,                                  
                                and have the matter reconsidered by the                                       
                                examiner, in which event the application will                                 
                                be remanded to the examiner . . . .                                           
                                      (2) Request that the application be                                     
                                reheard under § 1.197(b) by the Board of                                      
                                Patent Appeals and Interferences upon the                                     
                                same record . . . .                                                           






                                                     10                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007