Ex parte HOLTZ et al. - Page 13




              Appeal No. 1996-3550                                                                                        
              Application 08/218,165                                                                                      
              alcohol dehydrogenase, unsaturated fatty acids and the plant biomass; thus, there can be                    
              no delay between maceration of the biomass and the addition of yeast.  The examiner has                     
              provided no reason for modifying the references in this manner.  Similarly, independent                     
              claim 18 requires a particular yield of cis-3-hexen-1-ol.  According to page 5 of the                       
              specification, production of green note compounds predominantly composed of cis-3-                          
              hexen-1-ol depends on particular starting materials and process parameters, none of                         
              which are addressed in the statement of the rejection.                                                      
                     35 U.S.C. § 103 requires that obviousness be determined based on the claimed                         
              subject matter as a whole.  Where, as here, the determination of obviousness is based on                    
              less than the entire claimed subject matter, the examiner’s conclusion of obviousness is                    
              legally unsound and cannot be sustained.                                                                    
                     Accordingly, we reverse Rejection VII under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as it pertains to claims                 
              2, 6, 10, 16 and 18 through 37.                                                                             


                                                     CONCLUSION                                                           
                     Rejections I, II and VI are reversed; Rejection III is affirmed as it pertains to claims 1,          
              3, 5, 7, 8 and 11 through 13, and reversed as it pertains to claim 9; Rejections IV and V                   
              are affirmed as they pertain to claims 1, 3, 5, 7 and 12, and reversed as they pertain to                   
              claim 14; finally, Rejection VII is affirmed as it pertains to claims 1, 3 through 5, 7 through 9,          




                                                           13                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007