THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YUKIO SHIMAZAKI, NOBUHIRO KAWASHIMA, MIKI SUZUKI
YASUHITO TANAKA, RYO TANAKA, KIYOSHI SAKAI, HISAHIRO ISHIWARI
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0472
Application 08/259,152
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 26-
32, all the claims remaining in the present application.
Since the examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claim 31 ,1
the instant appeal involves only claims 26-30 and 32. Claim
26 is illustra-tive:
1See page 2 of the answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007