Ex parte SHIMAZAKI et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1997-0472                                                        
          Application No. 08/259,152                                                  


          Applicants have now found that the activity of plasminogen                  
          activators and particularly the plasminogen activator prepared              
          by the process claimed is (sic: in) U.S. Serial No. 529,147                 
          [U.S. Patent No. 3,998,947], may be powerfully potentiated by               
          combining it with a polysaccharide sulphate."                               




          From this reference disclosure it is clear to us that the                   
          plasminogen activator described by D'H is a "novel" one and                 
          not urokinase.  Furthermore, our review of U.S. Patent No.                  
          3,998,947 reveals that the activator described in the '947                  
          patent is a "tissular, endocellular plasminogen activator                   
          extracted from the organs of animals" (column 1, lines 19-21).              
          Hence, from our perspective, the conclusion is inescapable                  
          that the plasminogen activator of D'H is of the tissue-type                 
          and, therefore, not distinguishable from the presently claimed              
          t-PA.                                                                       
               Appellants also maintain that "in D'H polysaccharide                   
          sulphate is added for the purpose of precipitating urokinase,               
          not for dissolving urokinase" and "the objective of D'H is to               
          improve the activity of urokinase" (page 5 of brief).                       
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007