Appeal No. 1997-2247 Page 11 Application No. 08/259,798 “In the patentability context, claims are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretations. Moreover, limitations are not to be read into the claims from the specification.” In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 1184, 26 USPQ2d 1057, 1059 (Fed. Cir. 1993)(citing In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989)). Here, claim 10 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: a plurality of complementary pairs of bitlines ...; a precharge circuit for simultaneously precharging both leads of each of the plurality of pairs of bitlines to a common precharge voltage .... Similarly, claim 11 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: a plurality of complementary pairs of bitlines ...; and a circuit arranged for simultaneously precharging both leads of each of the plurality of pairs of bitlines to a common precharge voltage .... Giving the claims their broadest reasonable interpretation, the limitations recite a precharge circuit for simultaneously precharging both bit lines of a complementary pair of bitlines to a precharge voltage.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007