Ex parte CLINE - Page 16




          Appeal No. 1997-2247                                      Page 16           
          Application No. 08/259,798                                                  




                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               In summary, the rejection of claims 1-4 under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as obvious over Hardee and the rejection of claims 5-9                
          and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Hardee in view of              
          Kuo are reversed.  The rejection of claims 10 and 11 under 35               
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 as obvious over Kuo, however, is affirmed.                            









               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R.                 
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 


                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    












Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007