The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YASUNORI UETANI, YASUNORI DOI, KAZUHIKO HASHIMOTO, HARUYOSHI OSAKI and RYOTARU HANAWA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2593 Application No. 08/160,290 ____________ HEARD: October 23, 2000 ____________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 7, 10, 14, 18, 22, and 23. In light of appellants’ "Grouping of Claims" in the brief at page 4, we reproduce appealed claims 1 and 10 below which are representative of the two groups of appealed claims for which appellants seek separate consideration:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007