Ex parte UETANI et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1997-2593                                                        
          Application No. 08/160,290                                                  


               As evident from our comments above, and based on                       
          appellants’ groupings of the claims in the brief at page 4, we              
          have decided this appeal based on representative claims 1 and               
          10.  See 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) 1995.  Based on arguments made                
          by appellants’ counsel at the oral hearing that neither of the              
          applied references disclose certain specific solvent                        
          components set forth in some of the more limited appealed                   
          claims, we point out that appellants have made no factual                   
          challenge to the examiner’s finding that such solvents are                  
          "well known interchangeable solvents within the same boiling                
          point characteristic range that have been utilized in this                  
          type of composition in the past."  See the answer at page 7.                
          In the event of any further prosecution of this application,                
          for example in a continuation application, appellants may                   
          desire to address the examiner’s above findings so that the                 
          issue of obviousness as to the more limited claims may be                   
          properly joined.                                                            
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed.                              






                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007