Ex parte TANAKA et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1997-2848                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/444,106                                                                                                             


                          where, Tp is a pitch of said recording tracks of said                                                                         
                 rotatable magnetic recording disk, and Hc is a coercive force                                                                          
                 of said magnetic recording disk,                                                                                                       
                          wherein g is selected in the stated range so that the                                                                         
                 ring recording head generates a side fringe magnetic field,                                                                            
                 which extends beyond said recording track width Tw, to erase a                                                                         
                 side-fringe erase region extending outside a selected                                                                                  
                 recording track in said recording disk without erasing data on                                                                         
                 adjacent tracks of said selected recording track.                                                                                      
                          The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                                                                               
                 Koyama et al. (Koyama)                                5,168,409                                    Dec. 01,                            
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                 Suyama (European)                                     EP0521442                                    Jan. 07,                            
                 1993                                                                                                                                   
                          Claims 1, 2, 14, and 19-33 stand finally rejected under                                                                       
                 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Koyama in view of                                                                           
                 Suyama.                                                                                                                                
                          Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the                                                                     
                 Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs  and Answer for the             1                                                            
                 respective details.                                                                                                                    
                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                                                                                                                            
                 appeal, the rejection advanced by the Examiner, the arguments                                                                          

                          1The Appeal Brief was filed August 7, 1996.  In response                                                                      
                 to the Examiner’s Answer dated January 27, 1997, a Reply Brief                                                                         
                 was filed February 10, 1997 which was acknowledged and entered                                                                         
                 by the Examiner without further comment on May 13, 1997.                                                                               
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007