Appeal No. 1998-0049 Application 08/289,028 are present," which require conditional execution of an instruction depending on the set of status conditions selected by the mask bits. Appellants generally agree with the Examiner's characterization of the teachings of Itomitsu (Br4) and, hence, we will not further discuss the reference. Appellants argue that the four bit "mask" field in Vandierendonck selects one of 16 digit masks in the encoder and decoder arrays of digit mask logic 35, as described at col. 13, line 12 to col. 14, line 9, and thus "Vandierendonck's 'mask' is actually in the encoder and decoder arrays, and not in the instruction, as claimed by Appellants" (Br5). We do not find where the Examiner clearly answers this argument. Nevertheless, claim 61 does not expressly require a one-to-one correspondence between mask bits and status conditions and, therefore, claim 61 does not preclude the mask bits from being encoded mask bits that are decoded to produce the actual mask bits to be used to select status conditions. - 7 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007