Ex parte DE JONG et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-0069                                                        
          Application 08/356,946                                                      

          values from a sub-circuit 30 or 36 in the IC connected to                   
          BST cells 32 and 38 in figure 2 in an operational mode and                  
          test signals in a test mode, which allows testing of the                    
          interconnection by the BST method.                                          
               Claim 7 is reproduced below.                                           
               7.  A method of testing an interconnection between an                  
               output of a means which, in an operational mode                        
               supplies a fixed logic value, and a signal input of an                 
               electronic circuit, the method comprising: (1) setting                 
               the means and the electronic circuit to a test mode                    
               through predetermined signals, (2) supplying test data                 
               to a first test connection of the means and                            
               transferring, via the output of the means, test data to                
               the interconnection as an alternative to the fixed                     
               logic value, and (3) receiving result data in the                      
               electronic circuit via the signal input and                            
               transferring the result data to a second test                          
               connection of the electronic circuit for verification.                 

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:2                       
               Jarwala et al. (Jarwala)      5,029,166          July                  
          2, 1991                                                                     

            The Examiner also cites Sauerwald et al., U.S. Patent2                                                                      
          4,879,717, Sauerwald et al., U.S. Patent 4,967,142, Tokuda                  
          et al., U.S. Patent 5,384,533, and Sullivan, U.S. Patent                    
          5,487,074, in the list of prior art of record relied upon in                
          the rejection of the claims under appeal (Examiner's Answer,                
          page 3).                                                                    
          However, the references are not applied in any of the                       
          rejections.  The listing of prior art in an Examiner's Answer               
          should be limited to the references relied on in the                        
          rejections on appeal.  See Manual of Patent Examining                       
          Procedure § 1208.                                                           
                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007