Ex parte ANHAUSER et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 34              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                      Ex parte DIETER ANHAUSER, LOTHAR DEURER,                        
                          THOMAS HILLE, and PETER STEINBORN                           
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-0244                                  
                             Application No. 08/531,890                               
                                     __________                                       
                                HEARD: Oct. 12, 2000                                  
                                     __________                                       

          Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Dieter Anhauser et al. appeal from the final rejection of              
          claims 2 through 4, all of the claims pending in the                        
          application.  We reverse and enter new grounds of rejection.                



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007