Appeal No. 1998-0244 Application No. 08/531,890 adhesive drug-free backing layer and a removable protective layer and (2) inserting individual quadrangular pressure- sensitive adhesive drug-reservoir-sections one after the other between the layers. According to the original disclosure (see pages 8 through 11), however, the individual quadrangular pressure-sensitive adhesive drug-reservoir-sections (5 and 6) are placed on the removable protective layer (3) before the pressure-sensitive adhesive drug-free backing layer (1 and 4) is ever laminated to the removable protective layer. In other words, the process described in the original specification does not contemplate the provision of a laminate of two layers in tape form and the insertion of quadrangular sections between the laminate layers. Thus, the disclosure of the application as originally filed would not reasonably convey to the artisan that the appellants had possession at that time of the process now recited in claims 3 and 4, and in claim 2 which depends from claim 3. Claims 2 through 4 are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. This statutory provision requires that the claims accurately define the invention. See In re Knowlton, 481 F.2d 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007