Ex parte HAVEMANN - Page 1




                          THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                           
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                           
             (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                             
             (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           
                                                                                Paper No. 19                      

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                _____________                                                     
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                _____________                                                     
                                      Ex parte ROBERT H. HAVEMANN                                                 
                                                _____________                                                     
                                           Appeal No. 1998-0341                                                   
                                       Application No. 08/476,293                                                 
                                               ______________                                                     
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                              _______________                                                     

             Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and HECKER, Administrative Patent                                          
             Judges.                                                                                              
             HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
             This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                             
             claims 11 through 18, all of the claims pending in this                                              
             application.  The invention relates to an integrated circuit.                                        
             More particularly, the invention provides a structure for                                            



                                                      -1-1                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007