Ex parte HAVEMANN - Page 4




             Appeal No. 1998-0341                                                                                 
             Application No. 08/476,293                                                                           



                          (e) an inorganic passivating layer deposited on the                                     
             sidewalls of said via where said via passes through                                                  
             said           organic-containing dielectric; and                                                    
                          (f) an electrical connection formed by filling said                                     
             via with a conducting material, said electrical                                                      
             connection         being connected to one of said patterned                                          
             conductors,               whereby connection can be made to a                                        
             second level of                patterned conductors deposited                                        
             above the inorganic                 dielectric layer.                                                
             The Examiner relies on the following references:                                                     

             Balda et al. (Balda)   4,523,372                      Jun. 18, 1985                                  
             Page et al. (Page)               5,284,801                  Feb.  8, 1994                            
             Kokkotakis          EP 0 177 845          Apr. 16, 1986                                              
             (published European Patent Office Application)                                                       
             ?Lithographic Patterns with a Barrier Liner,” 32 IBM Technical                                       
             Disclosure Bulletin, no. 10B, 114-115, (March 1990) (IBM).                                           

             Claims 11 through 14 and 16 through 18 stand rejected                                                
             under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kokkotakis                                       
             and IBM in view of Balda.                                                                            
             Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                                                 
             being unpatentable over Kokkotakis, IBM and Balda, and further                                       
             in view of Page.                                                                                     
             Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the                                             
             Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the                                          


                                                      -4-4                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007