THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte HIROSHI MUKAWA
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-0599
Application 08/434,0291
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge., and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 31-36. Claims 27 and 29-30
have been allowed. Claims 1-26 and 28 have been canceled.
References relied on by the Examiner
Kato 4,885,653 December
5, 1989
1
Filed May 3, 1995. According to the appellant, it
is a continuation of application 08/195,976, filed February
10, 1994, which is a continuation of application 07/833,927,
filed February 11, 1992. The real party in interest is Sony
Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007