Ex parte AUM - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not 
               written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding        
               precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                 Paper No. 26         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Ex parte YOON-SUB AUM                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1343                                 
                              Application No. 08/154,695                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF1                                      
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FLEMING, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 6, 7, and 9 through 11 (as renumbered by                
          the examiner in the Office action (Paper No. 5) mailed                      
          November 21, 1995.  Claims 1 through 5 and 8 have been                      
          allowed.                                                                    


               We observe that on May 14, 2000 (paper no. 20), appellant filed a1                                                                     
          waiver of the oral hearing set for May 15, 2000.                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007