THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YOON-SUB AUM ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1343 Application No. 08/154,695 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before FLEMING, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 6, 7, and 9 through 11 (as renumbered by the examiner in the Office action (Paper No. 5) mailed November 21, 1995. Claims 1 through 5 and 8 have been allowed. We observe that on May 14, 2000 (paper no. 20), appellant filed a1 waiver of the oral hearing set for May 15, 2000.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007