Appeal No. 1998-1343
Application No. 08/154,695
rejection of claim 9 relates to the data output control signal
being generated by the CPU (see Brief, page 9). However, no
such limitation appears in claim 9. A data output control
signal need only be generated, but not by any particular
element. Consequently, appellant's argument for claim 9 is
not persuasive. Therefore, we will affirm the rejection of
claim 9.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 6, 7,10,
and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)is reversed. The decision of
the examiner rejecting claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)is
affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007