Appeal No. 1997-2510
Application No. 07/868,539
Summerton, however, fails to make up for the deficiency in the
combination of Vickers in view of Sakata, Metzler, Uhlmann and Inouye; or
Bielinska, in view of Sakata, Uhlmann and Inouye. See supra.
Accordingly we reverse the rejection of claims 4 and 9 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as obvious over Vickers, in view of Sakata, Metzler, Uhlmann and Inouye;
or Bielinska, in view of Sakata, Uhlmann and Inouye, further in view of
Summerton.
REVERSED, VACATED and REMANDED
)
Sherman D. Winters )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Donald E. Adams )
Administrative Patent Judge )
30
Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007