The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte TAKASHI ONISHI,
EIJI IWAMURA, SEIGO YAMAMOTO,
KATSUTOSI TAKAGI,
and KAZUO YOSHIKAWA
Appeal No. 1998-2948
Application 08/400,8611
HEARD: May 10, 2001
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed March 8, 1995, entitled1
"Method Of Manufacturing Active Matrix Type Liquid Crystal
Display," which claims the foreign filing priority benefit
under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Japanese Application 6-150024, filed
June 30, 1994.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007