VISSER et al v. HOFVANDER et al - Page 4




          Interference 103,579                                                        

               Serial No.:         08/070,455, filed November 24, 1993                
               Accorded Benefit:   International Application                          
                                   PCT/SE91/00892, filed December 20, 1991            
                    Count 1                                                           
                    A homologous construct of the potato plant comprising             
               a full length potato granule-bound starch synthase (PGBSS)             
               cDNA or genomic DNA.                                                   
                    The claims of the parties which were designated as                
               corresponding to Count 1 were:                                         
                    Hofvander:     Claims 1, 4, and 6-23                              
                    Visser:        Claims 1, 4-8, 11, 13-20, and 23-27.               
               June 6, 1995 - Hofvander filed U.S. Application 08/470,720             
          (hereafter Hofvander’s patented application) as a continuation of           
          Hofvander’s involved application, filed November 24, 1993, first            
          filed December 20, 1991, as Hofvander’s PCT application.                    
               September 5, 1996 - Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(b)               
          for judgment that there is no interference in fact (Visser’s                
          Preliminary Motion 1 (Paper No. 17)) because none of Visser’s               
          claims designated as corresponding to Count 1 are directed to the           
          same patentable invention as any of Hofvander’s claims designated           
          as corresponding to Count 1 (Paper No. 17, p. 2, para. 2).                  
               September 5, 1996 - Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(a)               
          for judgment that Claims 1, 4, and 6 to 23 of Hofvander’s                   
          involved application, filed November 24, 1993, designated as                
          corresponding to Count 1, are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.                  

                                         -4-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007