Interference 103,579
Preliminary Motion No. 3 (Paper No. 19)).
September 5, 1996 - Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(a)
for judgment that Hofvander’s Claims 1, 4, and 6-23 are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102 over Visser et al. (Visser’s
1991 publication), “Inhibition of the Expression of the Gene for
Granule-Bound Starch Synthase in Potato by Antisense Constructs,”
Mol. Gen. Genet., Vol. 225, pp. 289-296 (1991)(VDX 8)(Visser’s
Preliminary Motion No. 4 (Paper No. 20), contingent on denial of
Visser’s Preliminary Motion No. 1 (Paper No. 17)).
September 5, 1996 - Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(4)
to have Visser’s Claims 1, 4, 8, 11, 13-20, 22, and 24-27
designated as not corresponding to Count 1 (Visser’s Preliminary
Motion No. 5 (Paper No. 21)).
September 5, 1996 - Contingent upon denial of Visser
Preliminary Motions 1-5, Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(1)
to redefine the interfering subject matter by substituting a new
Count V-11 for Count 1 (Visser’s Contingent Preliminary Motion
No. 6 (Paper No. 22)).
September 5, 1996 - Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(f) to
1 Proposed Count V-1
A homologous construct of the potato
plant comprising potato granule-bound starch
synthase (PGBSS) genomic DNA oriented in
the antisense direction.
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007