VISSER et al v. HOFVANDER et al - Page 5




          Interference 103,579                                                        

          § 102 over Hergersberg, “A Molecular Analysis of the waxy Gene              
          from Solanum tuberosum and Expression of waxy antisense RNA in              
          transgenic Potatoes,” Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des              
          Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat              
          der Universitat zu Koln, University of Cologne, Cologne, pp. 1-79           
          (1988)(Visser Documentary Exhibit 1 (Visser’s Documentary                   
          Exhibit 1 (VDX 1)), or Hovenkamp-Hermelink, et al. (Hovenkamp-              
          Hermelink), “Isolation of an Amylose-Free Starch Mutant of the              
          Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.),” Theor. Appl. Genet., Vol. 75,               
          pp. 217-221 (1987)(VDX 9); and/or under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view             
          of the combined teachings of Hergersberg; Hovenkamp-Hermelink;              
          Visser (Visser’s PhD Thesis), “Manipulation of the Starch                   
          Composition of Solanum Tuberosum L. Using Agrobacterium                     
          Rhizogenes Mediated Transformation,” PhD Thesis, University of              
          Groningen, The Netherlands, pp. 9-139 (February 27, 1989)(VDX 7);           
          and van der Leij et al. (van der Leij), “Sequence of the                    
          Structural Gene for Granule-Bound Starch Synthase of Potato                 
          (Solanum tuberosum L.) and Evidence for a Single Point Deletion             
          in the amf Allele,” Mol. Gen. Genet., Vol. 228, pp. 240-248                 
          (1991)(VDX 3)(Visser’s Preliminary Motion No. 2 (Paper No. 18)).            
               September 5, 1996 - Visser moved under 37 CFR § 1.633(a)               
          for judgment that Hofvander’s Claims 1, 4, 6-20, and 22 are                 
          unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (Visser’s               

                                         -5-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007