Ex Parte MOVALLI et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 28         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                      Ex parte MICHAEL MOVALLI, and BRIAN MOVALLI                     
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-1962                                 
                              Application No. 08/697,421                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.          
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 1-27 and 29-31.  Claim 28 was canceled earlier in the                
          prosecution.  An amendment filed November 23, 1999 after final              
          rejection was denied entry by the Examiner.  A further amendment            
          filed April 19, 2000 after final rejection, which amended claims 3,         
          4, and 14 and canceled claim 24, was approved for entry by the              
          Examiner.  Accordingly, only the rejection of claims 1-23, 25-27,           
          and 29-31 is before us on appeal.                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007