Ex Parte MOVALLI et al - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2000-1962                                                        
          Application No. 08/697,421                                                  


                         Rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b)                            
               We make the following new ground of rejection using our                                                                     
          authority under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).  Claim 1 is rejected under 35            
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Griffith (U.S. Patent No.           
          4,825,050, of record, and cited and applied by the Examiner in this         
          appeal).  Griffith discloses, in particular at Figure 4A and the            
          accompanying description beginning at column 4, line 60, a method           
          of generating a secured endorsed transaction including receiving a          
          unique human identifier (individual identification 412) along with          
          data 404, 408, 409, and 410 corresponding to a transaction.  The            
          characteristics of the unique identifier are provided at column 2,          
          lines 39-53 of Griffith.  As further indicated in Figure 4A, a              
          unique code in the form of a transaction information record 403 is          
          generated using the unique human identifier 412 and the transaction         
          data 404, 408, 409, and 410.                                                
               Although the Griffith reference has been applied only against          
          independent claim 1, this is not to be taken as an indication of            
          the patentability of any of the other claims on appeal.  In any             
          resumption of the prosecution of this application before the                
          Examiner, the Examiner should consider the applicability of                 
          Griffith, and any other discovered prior art, to all of the pending         
          claims.  We would also point out that, in addition to the unique            
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007