Ex Parte MCGREGOR et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-0450                                                                                     
              Application No. 09/142,814                                                                               

                     Claims 1 and 10 are representative of the claims on appeal and read as follows.                   
                     1.   A material for use in a wound dressing or a wound implant, the material                      
                     comprising a plurality of beads, wherein each bead comprises a porous core of a                   
                     first bioabsorbable material and a substantially non-porous layer of a second                     
                     bioabsorbable material around said core.                                                          
                     10.  A method of making bioabsorbable beads for use in wound dressings or                         
                     implants,  the method comprising:                                                                 
                     providing a dispersion of a first bioabsorbable material in a liquid solvent:                     
                     generating droplets of said dispersion;                                                           
                     freezing said droplets to form frozen droplets;                                                   
                     freeze drying or solvent drying the frozen droplets to form discrete porous cores                 
                     of said first bioabsorbable material; and                                                         
                     coating said porous cores with a substantially non-porous layer of a second                       
                     bioabsorbable material.                                                                           

                     The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                   
              Berg et al. (Berg)                4,837,285                          Jun.   6, 1989                      
              Silver et al. (Silver)            4,970,298                          Nov. 13, 1990                       
              United Kingdom Patent Application                                                                        
              Arnold                            GB 228 1861                        Mar. 22, 1995                       

              Grounds of Rejection                                                                                     
                     Claims 1-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 as anticipated by Arnold.                         
                     Claims 1-8 and 10-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as obvious over                      
              Berg in view of Silver or Arnold.                                                                        
                     We reverse these rejections.                                                                      




              2                                                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007