The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KUNIO WATANABE and SHOZO TAKEYA
___________
Appeal No. 2002-2274
Application No. 08/387,158
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 33-48
and 51-67. Claims 49 and 50, which are all of the other claims
remaining in the application, stand objected to as being
dependent from a rejected claim but allowable if rewritten in
independent form including all of the limitations of the base
claim and any intervening claims.
THE INVENTION
The appellants claim an alloy for a sacrificial anode and
claim a metal-reinforced concrete structure comprising a cathodic
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007