Appeal No. 1999-2252
Application 08/780,790
limitations in lines 5-7 of claim 17. The general statements25
by the Examiner in regard to this rejection do not address
these claim limitations.
Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of Claims
17-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Appellants' admitted prior art in view of Aichelmann and Dong.
C. Rejection of claims 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Appellants' admitted prior art.
Claims 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Appellants' admitted prior.
Appellants argue that the cited references do not teach,26
suggest, or render obvious (I) a data transfer method
involving a computer system having application and operating
system instructions stored in main memory, and (ii) the data
of the memory object associated with the fast buffer being
transferred to a sink device without storing the data in the
main memory during transfer.
25Answer, page 6.
26Brief, page 11.
15
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007