Ex Parte BECKER et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                    Paper No. 20                   
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                   __________                                                      
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                   __________                                                      
                                       Ex parte KATHERINE BECKER and                                               
                                                  JOHN SCOTT                                                       
                                                   __________                                                      
                                              Appeal No. 2001-0692                                                 
                                           Application No. 09/163,572                                              
                                                   __________                                                      
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                   __________                                                      
                Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                      
                final rejection of claims 1-4, 8-10, 13-33, 36, and 37, all of the claims remaining.               
                Claims 1, 9, and 23 are representative and read as follows:                                        
                       1.     A method of simultaneously testing a plurality of compounds for                      
                              activity in a screen which is a biological assay to determine the                    
                              biological activity of the compounds comprising the steps of:                        
                              (a)    placing a plurality of the compounds into at least two arrays,                
                                     each having a plurality of test zones, with multiple                          
                                     compounds in each zone and at least one identical                             
                                     compound in at least two arrays;                                              







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007