Ex Parte Lasson - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-0058                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/728,518                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellant's invention relates to a method for potentiating an engine's power                     
              contribution to a hybrid electric vehicle's performance in a take-off operating condition.                  
              A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                    


                     Claims 3 to 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                        
              U.S. Patent No. 5,081,3652 to Field et al. (Field).                                                         


                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                        
              the appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the answer                          
              (Paper No. 15, mailed February 12, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in                           
              support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 14, filed January 21, 2003) for the                   
              appellant's arguments thereagainst.                                                                         


                                                       OPINION                                                            
                     In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to                      
              the appellant's specification and claims, to the Field patent, and to the respective                        
              positions articulated by the appellant and the examiner.  As a consequence of our                           
              review, we make the determinations which follow.                                                            

                     2 Issued January 14, 1992.                                                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007