The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GERHARD FUCHS and RUPERT SPINDELBALKER
___________
Appeal No. 2003-0421
Application No. 09/508,793
__________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of claims 6, 7 and 9. Claims 10 and 11 are the
only other claims pending in this application and stand allowed
by the examiner (see the amendment dated Dec. 7, 2001, Paper No.
9, entered as noted in the Answer dated Apr. 4, 2002, Paper No.
13; see the Order Returning Undocketed Appeal to Examiner dated
Aug. 6, 2002, Paper No. 16, and the Reply Brief dated Sep. 23,
2002, Paper No. 18). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007