Appeal No. 2003-1310
Application No. 09/761,738
of a larger operational circuit by arranging different mask
patterns for the layout pattern, as recited in Appellant’s claim
21. Accordingly, we affirm the rejection of claim 21 as well as
claims 22-24, which are grouped by Appellant (brief, page 4) as
standing or falling together with claim 21, under 35 U.S.C. § 102
over Krolikowsky.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007