The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SHUICHI EUNO, YOSHINORI OKUMURA, SHIGENOBU MAEDA, and SHIGETO MAEGAWA ____________ Appeal No. 2003-2107 Application No. 09/429,283 ____________ HEARD: April 13, 2004 ____________ Before GROSS, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 14 through 27, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device having two types of transistors formed on a single substrate. The method includes introducing an impurity into the polysilicon layer of both transistors, wherein the impurity dosage for one transistor differs from the impurity dosage for the other. Claim 14 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007