Ex Parte UENO et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2003-2107                                                        
          Application No. 09/429,283                                                  


          n-type gates," and Kuroi discloses "the effects of different                
          nitrogen concentrations and dopant concentrations in the gate of            
          a MOSFET for both p-type and n-type gates thus establishing                 
          concentrations of dopant and nitrogen together to be a result               
          effective variable."  Although the examiner includes Sze in the             
          statement of the rejection, we find no explanation as to why the            
          examiner included Sze.                                                      
               Rather than try to decipher the examiner's reasoning for               
          combining the references, we will analyze each reference for its            
          teachings and combinability with the other references applied by            
          the examiner.  We begin with Chishima.                                      
               As indicated by the examiner (Answer, page 5), Chishima                
          teaches implanting nitrogen in the p-channel area.  However,                
          Chishima also explains (translation, page 4) that for an n-                 
          channel MOSFET, nitrogen doping "leads to an undesired increase             
          in the gate capacitance.  Consequently, doping of nitrogen N in             
          the n-channel MOSFET region should be avoided" (emphasis ours).             
          We note that claim 14 encompasses impurities other than nitrogen;           
          however, nitrogen is the only impurity discussed by Chishima with           
          regard to both transistors.  Accordingly, Chishima teaches away             
          from the claimed invention.  Further, the Federal Circuit has               
          held that "a proposed modification [is] inappropriate for an                
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007