Appeal No. 2004-0297 Application No. 09/265,451 data bus 38. Otherwise, parallel data supplied from data bus 38 is converted into serial data and output to the terminal equipment through contact section 3 [column 2, line 31, through column 3, line 47]. Danielson discloses a pocket-size computer processing system which includes, among other features, a touch sensitive display (see, for example, element 17 in Figure 2). Hale discloses a pocket-size personal terminal for performing a variety of financial and other transactions on-line. The terminal possesses the capability of generating a “review history trail” which displays a record of earlier transactions (see page 9 and Figure 5). The manner in which the examiner applies Tamada, Danielson and Hale to reject claims 48, 50 through 63, 66 through 72 and 74 through 82 appears in the final rejection and answer, while the appellant’s position to the contrary appears in the briefs. As the appellant’s arguments frame the issues for review, we shall evaluate the rejection of each of the contested claims in the order argued in the main brief. Claim 48 The appellant submits that the rejection of claim 48 is unsound because (1) Tamada relates to conventional transactions involving paper slips rather than electronic transactions of the 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007