Appeal No. 2004-0550 Application No. 09/802,201 Appel 5,605,861 Feb. 25, 1997 Rajkanan et al. (Rajkanan) 5,750,426 May 12, 1998 Dennen 5,814,869 Sep. 29, 1998 Lee et al. (Lee) 6,103,582 Aug. 15, 2000 (filed Aug. 13, 1998) Boden, Jr. et al. (Boden) 6,165,821 Dec. 26, 2000 (filed Feb. 09, 1998) Wu et al. (Wu) 6,232,208 May 15, 2001 (filed Nov. 06, 1998) Draper 6,285,052 Sep. 04, 2001 (filed Sep. 26, 1997) The following rejections are before us for review in this appeal: (1) claims 1-3 and 6-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Rajkanan in view of Lee and Draper (Answer, page 4); (2) claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Rajkanan in view of Lee, Wu and Boden (Answer, page 6); (3) claims 10-13 stand rejected under section 103(a) over the references as in rejection (2) further in view of Draper (Answer, page 7); (4) claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under section 103(a) over Rajkanan in view of Dennen, Appel and Draper (Answer, page 8); 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007