Ex Parte LOW et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2004-0748                                                          Page 2              
            Application No. 09/427,226                                                                        


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The appellants' invention relates generally to methods and devices for increasing          
            the density of integrated circuits (IC's) placed on a substrate such as a printed circuit         
            board (PCB), and more particularly to methods and devices for stacking chips                      
            comprising surface mount technology (SMT) chip packages (specification, p. 1).  A copy            
            of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                 


                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the            
            appealed claims are:                                                                              
            Burns                            5,484,959                 Jan. 16, 1996                          
            Buechele                         5,768,772                 June 23, 1998                          
            Hacke                            6,157541                  Dec. 5, 2000                           
            Farnworth                        6,168,969                 Jan. 2, 2001                           


                   Claims 1, 2, 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                    
            anticipated by Buechele.                                                                          


                   Claims 3 to 5 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                      
            anticipated by Hacke.                                                                             


                   Claims 6, 7 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable              
            over Farnworth in view of Burns.                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007