Appeal No. 2005-1216 Application No. 10/117,453 desorption from the sides of the pins” into the surrounding space. Id., lines 28-30. Accordingly, we find that Hillenkamp I [and II] discloses individually addressing each sample. With respect to claims 31 and 36-41, Hillenkamp I discloses that MALDI spectrometry is “a method for mass determination of substances such as peptides, proteins and DNA fragments.” See, Hillenkamp I, col. 1, lines 6-9. The patent further discloses that “[i]n this method, the substance to be analyzed is typically placed in a solution of matrix material and coated onto a support. The solute evaporates, leaving the analyte in a solid matrix which is then illuminated to cause the analyte molecules or synthetic polymers to be desorbed.” Id., lines 9-13. The patent still further discloses that “the matrix consist[s] of a relatively low molecular weight aromatic substance such as nicotinic acid, benzoic or cinnamic acid, holds a quantity of the peptide, protein or other substance to be analyzed and is irradiated with a high intensity laser beam to cause desorption of the analyte from a surface of the sample.” Id., lines 24-30. The desorption process is said to be “especially useful for releasing large biological molecules without charring, fragmentation, or chemical degradation to a mass spectometer or similar instrument for separation and detection.” Id., lines 14-17. We point out that a reactant is merely something which is involved in a chemical reaction. Thus, from the foregoing, we find that the biopolymer samples incorporated into the MALDI matrix, are reactants in the MALDI spectrometry process. Since Hillenkamp I discloses that the sample holders taught therein, which include the sample holders set 17Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007