Ex Parte Chang et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-0406                                                        
          Application 09/497,865                                                      
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
               Ajioka                      3,720,953       March 13, 1973             
               Chang et al. (Chang)        5,077,562    December 31, 1991             
               Aoki et al. (Aoki)          5,257,030     October 26, 1993             
               Barrett et al. (Barrett)    5,973,647     October 26, 1999             
               Karlsson et al. (Karlsson)  6,034,634        March 7, 2000             
          (filed October 24, 1997)                                                    
               Isamu Chiba et al. (Chiba), Digital Beam Forming (DBF)                 
               Antenna System for Mobile Communications, IEEE AES Systems             
               Magazine, September 1997, pp. 31-41.                                   
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 4, 5, 7-9, 11, 13-18, 21, 22, and 25-37 stand                
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Karlsson, Chiba, Chang, and Aoki.                                           
               Claims 2, 3, 10, 12, 19, 20, 23, and 24 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Karlsson, Chiba,              
          Chang, and Aoki, further in view of Ajioka and Barrett.                     
               We refer to the final rejection (pages referred to as                  
          "FR__") and the examiner's answer (pages referred to as "EA__")             
          for a statement of the examiner's rejection, and to the brief               
          (pages referred to as "Br__") and reply brief (pages referred to            
          as "RBr__") for a statement of appellants' arguments                        
          thereagainst.                                                               




                                        - 3 -                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007