The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CIPRIANO A. SANTOS, DIRK M. BEYER, TROY SHAHOUMIAN, BILAL IQBAL, HARLAN CROWDER and VINEET SINGH ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1817 Application No. 09/851,514 Technology Center 3600 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before LINCK, HORNER and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, and 4-20, all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 3 has been canceled. We affirm.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007