Ex Parte Santos et al - Page 12



                Appeal No. 2006-1817                                                                 Page 12                          
                Application No. 09/851,514                                                                                               

                planning is a form of strategic planning that is engaged in by business enterprises,                                     
                and as such, the Harhen reference is in a related field.                                                                 
                        We further find that both Gerace and Deaton are directed to solving the same                                     
                problem as the claimed invention, viz, developing campaign plans that optimize                                           
                differential promotion allocation among prospective customers.  (Examiner’s                                              
                Answer, pp. 3 and 6), and the Harhen system is closely analogous to the claimed                                          
                marketing campaign-planning system.  (Examiner’s Answer, pp. 13-14).  In                                                 
                particular, the teaching of Harhen is directed to a method of solving a projection                                       
                problem for strategic planning in any business enterprise.  Harhen teaches that the                                      
                method can be used “to determine the behavior of a variable in the future.”                                              
                (Harhen, col. 5, lines 54-55.)  Marketing campaign planning is a strategic planning                                      
                exercise that requires a projection as to how different variables will affect future                                     
                sales in order to optimize a campaign plan.  Thus, the teachings of Harhen would                                         
                have been reasonably pertinent to the problem with which the appellants were                                             
                concerned.  See In re Kahn, 441 F.3d at 986-87, 78 USPQ2d at 1336 (citing In re                                          
                Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1447 (Fed. Cir. 1992)).                                                                          
                        We further find that one reasonably skilled in the applicable art would have                                     
                been aware of the nature of the extensive use of computer-implemented systems in                                         
                the marketing industry, of the prior art marketing campaign-planning systems of                                          
                Gerace and Deaton, and of the analogous prior art strategic planning system of                                           
                Harhen.  Based on this awareness, and recognizing that there are differences                                             
                between the claimed subject matter and the state of the prior art, we hold that the                                      
                gap between the prior art and the claimed method is simply not so great as to                                            
                render the claimed method nonobvious to one reasonably skilled in the art.  We                                           
                hold the claimed method to be an obvious variation on the prior art marketing                                            



Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007