Appeal No. 2006-1817 Page 12 Application No. 09/851,514 planning is a form of strategic planning that is engaged in by business enterprises, and as such, the Harhen reference is in a related field. We further find that both Gerace and Deaton are directed to solving the same problem as the claimed invention, viz, developing campaign plans that optimize differential promotion allocation among prospective customers. (Examiner’s Answer, pp. 3 and 6), and the Harhen system is closely analogous to the claimed marketing campaign-planning system. (Examiner’s Answer, pp. 13-14). In particular, the teaching of Harhen is directed to a method of solving a projection problem for strategic planning in any business enterprise. Harhen teaches that the method can be used “to determine the behavior of a variable in the future.” (Harhen, col. 5, lines 54-55.) Marketing campaign planning is a strategic planning exercise that requires a projection as to how different variables will affect future sales in order to optimize a campaign plan. Thus, the teachings of Harhen would have been reasonably pertinent to the problem with which the appellants were concerned. See In re Kahn, 441 F.3d at 986-87, 78 USPQ2d at 1336 (citing In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1447 (Fed. Cir. 1992)). We further find that one reasonably skilled in the applicable art would have been aware of the nature of the extensive use of computer-implemented systems in the marketing industry, of the prior art marketing campaign-planning systems of Gerace and Deaton, and of the analogous prior art strategic planning system of Harhen. Based on this awareness, and recognizing that there are differences between the claimed subject matter and the state of the prior art, we hold that the gap between the prior art and the claimed method is simply not so great as to render the claimed method nonobvious to one reasonably skilled in the art. We hold the claimed method to be an obvious variation on the prior art marketingPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007