Appeal No. 2006-2184 Application No. 09/819,427 those found in Sullivan. Thus, the examiner's rejection is proper even based solely on the teachings of Sullivan. In summary, we have sustained the examiner's rejection with respect to all claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 3- 7, 9-11, 13-17, 19-21, 23-27, and 29-41 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ALLEN R. MACDONALD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/jaj/rwk 13Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007