Ex Parte Abraham et al - Page 8




               Appeal No. 2006-2344                                                                                             
               Application No. 10/408,890                                                                                       

                      Now, the question before us is what APA, Akimoto and Subramanian would have taught                        
               to one of ordinary skill in the art?  To answer this question, we find the following facts:                      
                      1. At pages 2 and 3 of Appellants’ specification, APA states:                                             
                      [0009] In the prior-art measuring equipment, the wafers are rotated during measurement.                   
                      During this process, the wafer is usually supported on a wafer table that is equipped with a              
                      rotary drive.                                                                                             
                      [0010] To avoid uncontrolled shifting during rotation, the wafer must be fixed. A vacuum                  
                      suction system may be used for this purpose, which pulls the wafer flat on a very plane                   
                      surface. This also produces a high degree of planarity of the wafer, which is required for                
                      accurate measurement. Vacuum suction systems, however, have the drawback that the                         
                      contact can cause contamination on the rear side of the wafer, which can reduce the yield.                
                      [0011] Attempts have therefore been made to replace such systems with other devices.                      
                      However, the elimination of vacuum suction systems presumes that the position and the                     
                      distance of the wafer do not have a negative influence on the measurement of the wafer, or                
                      that the measuring head automatically corrects its position, as it is described, for instance in          
                      DE 198 16 974. This makes it possible to dispense with an active alignment of the wafer                   
                      table and the planarization by means of a complex vacuum suction system to save costs and                 
                      weight.  As a result it is possible to use wafer holding systems that grasp the wafer only                
                      along its periphery. These are so-called edge gripping systems, which are provided with                   
                      rollers to roll the wafer along its edges. The drawback of these systems, however, is that                
                      abrasive wear on the friction rollers can produce particulates that should be avoided in                  
                      semiconductor production.                                                                                 
                      [0012] Such edge gripping systems are also used to align the wafers. These are self-contained             
                      units, referred to as notch aligners, which align the wafer by means of its recess or notch in            
                      the wafer edge. Before such an alignment is possible, the position of the wafer and that of its           
                      notch must be determined, which requires an additional device called a notch aligner. With                
                      the notch detector and the notch aligner, the coordinate systems of the wafer and the                     
                      measuring system are aligned, so that the measurements can subsequently be carried out at                 
                      precisely determined locations of the wafer. A notch aligner is disclosed, for instance, in U.S.          
                      Pat. No. 5,102,280.                                                                                       
               2. At column 6, line 28 through column 7, line 4, Akimoto states:                                                
                              The interface section 13 has the same length in the direction of depth (in the direction          
                      of X) as that of the processing station 11 but is shorter in the direction of width. On the base          

                                                               8                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007