The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL D. MADDEN and MATTHEW T. VOSIKA
____________
Appeal 2006-2824
Application 10/441,513
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 29, 2006
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 1 through 29, which are the only claims pending in this
application, as amended subsequent to the Final Office action (see the
amendment dated Sep. 22, 2005, entered as per the Advisory Action dated
Oct. 12, 2005). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to Appellants, the invention is directed to an endless belt
for a shoe press and a method for forming such a belt, where the process
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007