Ex Parte Madden et al - Page 5

                Appeal 2006-2824                                                                                 
                Application 10/441,513                                                                           

                require the same polymeric material for each layer (Br. 8-9).  Appellants                        
                further argue that Grossmann is completely silent regarding the performance                      
                advantages that are achieved with the claimed subject matter (Br. 9).                            
                Finally, Appellants argue that claim 24 also requires the inner layer and                        
                outer layer be the same polymeric material (Br. 9).                                              
                       Appellants’ arguments are not persuasive.  As correctly found by the                      
                Examiner (Answer 8), Grossmann clearly teaches that the inner and outer                          
                layers of the belt may be made from the “same” or “identical” polymeric                          
                material.  See Grossmann, p. 2, last full paragraph, where “the abrasion-                        
                resistant layer [the outer layer] is made of the same or similar matrix                          
                material as the inner layer and is reinforced by embedded abrasion-resistant                     
                particles.”  See also p. 4, ll. 7-8, where Grossmann teaches “an advantageous                    
                refinement of this method, the second matrix material and the first matrix                       
                material are identical.”  As also correctly stated by the Examiner (Answer                       
                8), the language of the claims subject to this rejection does not preclude the                   
                additional particles embedded in the outer layer polymeric material.3                            
                Furthermore, Grossmann teaches that, before the hardening of the first layer,                    
                a second layer is poured on the first layer to form a long-term bond (p. 4,                      
                first full paragraph; see also p. 5, last three lines).  Therefore, since this time              
                between layer applications is sufficient to form a good bond, and since                          
                “substantial sagging” in claim 14 has not been defined or quantified in the                      
                                                                                                                
                3 See Genentech Inc. v. Chiron Corp., 112 F.3d 495, 501, 42 USPQ2d 1608, 1613 (Fed.              
                Cir. 1997) (“’Comprising’ is a term of art used in claim language which means that the           
                named elements are essential, but other elements may be added and still form a construct         
                within the scope of the claims.”).  We also note that the Examiner refers to Appellants’         
                admitted prior art (Answer 9), where Appellants admit that the prior art teaches multi-          
                layer press belts where each layer consists of the same material and the belt is formed          
                using rotational casting processes.                                                              
                                                       5                                                         


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007